Conceptualising agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy
نویسندگان
چکیده
It has become fashionable to conceptualise recent shifts in agrarian priorities as a „postproductivist‟ transition from a previously „productivist‟ agriculture. This notion has become more popular throughout the 1990s as a way to capture in one convenient package the complex changes experienced by both the agricultural sector specifically and rural areas more generally. However, the widespread and uncritical use of such an allencompassing term is rather surprising given debates elsewhere in human geography on the rejection of dualistic thinking. Yet, in agricultural and rural studies, the active creation and reinforcement of a productivist / post-productivist dualism has emerged as a means of explaining the uneven development of rural areas. This paper develops a critique of post-productivism to demonstrate its invalidity, presenting empirical evidence to refute five supposed characteristics relating to quality food, pluriactivity; sustainability, production dispersion and regulation. It is argued that future progress in agricultural research will only be made if post-productivism is abandoned. Effort should be refocused upon understanding deeper processes underpinning agricultural change using existing theoretical perspectives developed in human geography but which lack application in the agricultural context. Ecological modernisation is provided as a brief exemplar of how such progress may be achieved.
منابع مشابه
That Philosophy as Epistemological-Based is Not Debased: A Critique of Post-Modernist/Hermeneutic Critique of Traditional Philosophy
Over the centuries, beginning with the classic Greeks through the trends of the mid-20th century, philosophical enterprise has been intricately and seemingly irretrievably rooted in the theory of the given—an edification of philosophy as that giant mirror and standard for measuring what counts as knowledge; but is it thus synonymous with or reducible to epistemology? How or why? There are two a...
متن کاملRe-Conceptualising Public Health Interventions in Government: A Response to Recent Commentaries
متن کامل
Alternate Self, The Immortal Self: A Critique on The Double, a Psychoanalytic Study by Nasrin Shakibi Momtaz
The Discourse of Chaos in The Realm of The Unhearing: A Criticism of Fourteenth Hijri-Century Earache Based on A Postmodern Reading Mahshad Shahbazi Ph.D. Student of Persian Literature, Alzahra University [email protected] Abstract The present research is based on the critique of Fourteenth Hijri-Century Earache by Abbas Habibi Badrabadi. Based on a critical analysis and a postmode...
متن کاملCritique of Plays From Behind the Glasses in The Light of New Historicism, A review and critique of the play from Behind the Glasses: Tayyebeh Nasrollahi
From Behind the Glasses in The Light of New Historicism A review and critique of the play From Behind the Glasses Tayybeh Nasrollahi PhD student of Persian language and literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University [email protected] Abstract From the perspective of modern historicism, literature and history are influenced by the forces of cultural discourse and social action. New ...
متن کاملAnimal Genomics and Ambivalence: A Sociology of Animal Bodies in Agricultural Biotechnology
How may emergent biotechnologies impact upon our relations with other animals? To what extent are any changes indicative of new relations between society and nature? This paper critically explores which sociological tools can contribute to an understanding of the technologisation of animal bodies. By drawing upon interview data with animal scientists I argue that such technologies are being par...
متن کامل